The live scoreboard for the on-chain agent economy.
Wallets are shifting from humans to autonomous agents. We index that shift from the ERC-8004 registries — who the agents are, how fast they're growing, which are reputable, and which can be paid.
The shift, over time
cumulative registrations — service vs. the long tailThe headline count keeps climbing, but the 711 agents that actually provide a service are a thin sliver. Most growth is empty registrations and mass-minted NFT collectibles.
Most “callable” agents aren’t services
1,979 real interfaces, by tier- Real services711 · 36%
- NFT collectibles1,268 · 64%
Of the agents exposing a working interface, real services are the minority — most are mass-minted NFT collectibles. The 58 placeholder/spam agents are set aside with the non-callable long tail above.
How the service mix grew
real services by category · cumulativeDeFi yield/rebalancing dominates by volume — ~90% (408) is a single platform, Zyfai, deploying one ZK rebalancer agent per user wallet. Toggle it off in the legend to see how the smaller categories are growing.
How the collectibles mix grew
NFT-collection agents by collection · cumulativeA different shape from services: these aren't separate contracts but sub-collections minted into the one ERC-8004 registry. Two operators dominate — 1,002 Normie personas (still held by a single deployer wallet) and 251 FREAK agents (distributed to 251 distinct holders).